So, sometimes when you're talking about the pros and cons of turning a book into a film, people will say, "Well, I don't like when that happens because then I have the film's image of the character in my mind and it clashes with the way I imagined the character on my own."
I pretty much think that's the lamest argument ever.
Really, when you come across a character in a book do you pause reading and close your eyes and conjure up a specific face for that person in your mind? And then when you see a film version you go, "This is all wrong, I imagined him with a freckle under his left eye!" Because, myself, I just kind of understand the character's basic appearance from what the text says and that's as far as the visualization usually goes.
And who fricking cares if the character looks different than you imagined? How can that possibly ruin the entire story for you? I can see it being disappointing at most, that's it.
The only time I can see it mattering is if their appearance is important to the story, e.g. Harry Potter should have green eyes in the movie but doesn't.
I'm just wondering if anyone else thinks that complaint is totally irrelevant.